Monday, May 09, 2005
it was jeannie little dammit
I was not acting gay in that last post (see below) but acting like Jeannie Little. How different could those two things be!? http://www.melbourne247.com/show_event.asp?fmt=m&event_id=8385 I will rewrite it later in more masculine tone. Maybe my inclusion of the delightful phenomenon of Pauline Pantsdown in my lecture on Australian politics this afternoon caused me momentary confusion. http://www.pantsdown.wild.net.au/pantsdown10.htm
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
way to drops!
I do believe I have bored you stupid (are you stupid yet?) with details on my attempts to at very least get my foot in the door with the Fin...
-
As a child, naturally enough, I watched a lot of television and it being the early 1970s when I was a child, I watched a lot of what is no...
-
This is all getting very Daniel Clowes. It is very irritating that the black boxes (as per above) are basically illegible. I think the one h...
No comments:
Post a Comment