Showing posts with label Prince. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Prince. Show all posts

Sunday, February 04, 2024

we are the world


There is a new documentary on I think Netflix produced by Lionel Ritchie who must be relishing his comeback from punchline (which he didn't deserve - he's fine I guess) to legend status (I mean he's fine but ditto) who also narrates. It's the story, or a brief version of the story, of 'We Are the World', a song I considered obnoxious when it came out and ever after but which I have to say after watching this has been stuck in my head since. I hate it (the song). I wonder why this documentary was created on the 39th anniversary of WATW, and also, why only a few participants are interviewed in it (Huey Lewis - Dionne Warwick - Cyndi Lauper, Sheila E - I can't remember who else - some of the tech people). 

There are some bits that interest me that, being 20 at the time and knowing nothing (admittedly I still don't know nothing very much) didn't really hit me in 1985. For instance that the racial mix of WATW was important and that it was a black-initiated project. Harry Belafonte's idea, apparently, and Ritchie's composition with Michael Jackson (hilariously, Stevie Wonder was invited to be cocomposer and agreed but he didn't show up to do anything until the day of recording, when he arrived imagining they were all going to write the song). 

The documentary is worth watching to observe Bob Dylan's incredible unease in the studio as he tries to figure, I guess, how to present himself. He and Springsteen were highlighted in there, disproportionately to their worth as artists amongst people like, obviously, Stevie Wonder etc. But maybe that was just how it had to be - the single wasn't a work of art, it was a demand for bucks from stars who had suspended making art for the time being. So, the fly-on-the-wall stuff makes it all worth watching. Michael Jackson is presented not as a creepy paedo (which he was, right?) but as a childlike munchkin with funny, scary pets such as a snake. Al Jarreau is represented as drunk and Sheila E suggests she was probably only invited along in the hopes that she could persuade Prince to come (she couldn't). 

Obviously this is one single the value of which can only be measured in how much money it made. It has no artistic merit, and all soloists were just playing themselves. It could have been recorded by impressionists. None of which explains why I can't get it out of my head right now... I played sides 3 and 4 of the Toy Love live album yesterday, damn it! 

Wednesday, December 20, 2006

charles schulz was on the money



At least I do recall a Peanuts strip in which Snoopy became unfeasibly relaxed... as Charlie is here. I am still having trouble sleeping, but looking forward very much to the end of the week, year, etc. Did some Christmas shopping which was not soothing at all. JB had a Stones live concert from last year or recently anyway playing full bore at the doorway and it wasn't pleasant. Inside they were playing Prince which was slightly more pleasant (come to think of it, weren't they playing Prince in the cafe at the student union? Yes, yes they were).

I had an awkward conversation with the youngster at the counter re: my pink credit card, which Mia has made me self-conscious about. I was sort of saying I was surprise by it when it came in the mail, suggesting I found it a little de trop, he was sort of praising it I think. But all these conversations are split-seconders not worth analysing, ay.

a new wings compilation!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

'WINGS is the ultimate anthology of the band that defined the sound of the 1970s. Personally overseen by Paul, WINGS is available in an ...