Saturday, March 14, 2009
sixty years of being written on
Nothing too special about this image in itself I am just amazed by the way that people think that writing on a page (which they don't own, but that's another thing) is somehow supposed to be seen by subsequent readers as an important indication of how it has been previously read. I mean, it suxs.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
way to drops!
I do believe I have bored you stupid (are you stupid yet?) with details on my attempts to at very least get my foot in the door with the Fin...
-
As a child, naturally enough, I watched a lot of television and it being the early 1970s when I was a child, I watched a lot of what is no...
-
This is all getting very Daniel Clowes. It is very irritating that the black boxes (as per above) are basically illegible. I think the one h...
5 comments:
Do you mean, "It sux"?
No
But thanks for asking
I DeFace
therefore, I suck.
I am having this dilemma myself with a book that I OWN.
Got it for 50c at a junk shop, and having read it 3 times I amcompelled to post it to friend with some serious highlighting, but whoa! Guugle search reveals this book is going for 77 quid at online auctions of rare books.
To highlight or not?
My hardcover with mint dustjacket has torn flyleaves and would not fetch big bucks, but I feel like a vandal to mark it.
re Mediaeval Town Planning: My blogpal Hughesy the archaeologist writes great posts on digging up roman stuff at Fyre and Wylde Archaeology blog.
and if you know anything about the destruction/disappearance of Robin Boyds Southgate Fountain then please wade into the discussion at HighRiser blogspot.
Post a Comment