I would like to tell you some of the things that happened then, from its actual pages, but unfortunately Helmi has decided to sit partially on it so I can't get access to it at the moment.
Bummer but I know you'll understand. Oh, there is this one thing I photographed previously, which might give you some insight into why mx was a shit paper that should not have existed:
Laziest of the lazy. I can't really imagine how this could have been more lazy than it is. Obviously whoever did this voxpop for this day used the first three people they came across, and the only arguably non-lazy bit of the whole is the designer's (?) decision to separate the two blow-in boys from each other, which probably came from a policy of boy-girl-boy or girl-boy-girl, rather than anything to do with the text. This is so lazy, I've already thought about it more than any of the at least five people (participants+interviewer+photographer) involved, and of course nobody but nobody has thought about the 'My platform' column for 20 May 2008 since 20 May 2008, when the editor surely said 'spend more than two minutes on this next time mate'.
2 comments:
And two of the vox pop-ees are 18 year olds from Rushworth, j'accuse the MX of not casting the interviewee net very wide.
Totally. Obviously the voxpopper got them both together. Not only were they from the same place but they basically said the same thing! And also, they both nominated the CBD - not a suburb - as their favourite suburb. Who do I complain to?! Oh, I already did.
Post a Comment