Showing posts with label soft cell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label soft cell. Show all posts

Friday, November 06, 2020

electronic boy

Seriously what were my expectations from this book, and why do I feel somewhat disappointed but also somewhat compelled to keep reading it to the end, despite the numerous other partially-read books on the bedside table which will undoubtedly be much more rewarding? 

Partly, and ridiculously, I think it's because about six months ago Dave Ball showed up as a fb friend (surely he didn't ask to be my friend, perhaps I saw him engaging with someone else and I decided to join the gang - don't recall). Anyway, for a time there he seemed like a lot of fun, this man I'd never really thought about aside from the fact I had long enjoyed his solo album from around about the last days of Soft Cell and, of course, I had always been a Soft Cell fan (I like 'Bedsitter' and 'Torch' better than 'Tainted Love', and I like the second album a lot). He had a slightly cynical but entirely down-to-earth attitude to him that reminded me of some English men I didn't mind. So I thought - Dave's book, this'll be fun. 

OK so what is it. One thing it strangely isn't is very revealing about Marc Almond. That doesn't matter to me massively in the sense that I have read MA's memoir and feel satisfied I know what there is to be known about him. But it is still strange that he is such a cardboard figure here, and I can't tell whether DB was like, 'well everyone knows Marc Almond so I can't add to that', or whether he was like 'fuck people who want to know about Marc Almond, this is about me and I'm tired of being Matthew to his Sooty', or perhaps Marc Almond was like 'say anything about me and I'll sue you'. This last seems really unlikely, because they seem to have a decent enough working relationship, they don't need to reunite as Soft Cell, they're both individually very successful, but they have done periodically over time. Perhaps DB was like 'if I start talking about MA he will just dominate the whole thing', which also seems unlikely. Anyway, that's one odd thing.

Elsewhere there is disappointment; DB is such a lad, in that sad English way. Whelks and uppers. Seems to be a fan of a lot of things, and excited by other people's rebelliousness, but not ready to do too much of it himself. I mean, kudos to him for sustaining a career, but he's not ready to spill much about his creative process. 

More fool me I had no idea that his second-time-around-hit-duo The Grid had a major worldwide hit record in 1994, or maybe I did and I'd forgotten. When I listened to it ('Swamp Thing') I was chronically underwhelmed, though perhaps at the time it was more exciting than it is now. I really ended up wondering what it was all about. 

So, I think I mentioned a year or so ago I read the first half of John Taylor's memoir. I wasn't excited enough to get through to the end, but then I was never much of a DD fan. In this case, I admit there's a lot of interesting detail - particularly DB's upbringing, but also the studenty/art school origins of SC - but you never really feel like you're being inducted into anything, you're just being rather bald descriptions. Even when DB tells us how he feels about stuff, it doesn't really feel right. 

Wednesday, September 23, 2020

80s


I remember reading about one of the Futurama festivals, possibly the first, which I think had the Human League and Soft Cell at it, breaking out as it were. It might have been assumed by the Futurama organisers that the brand was the main thing and that the acts they presented would go on naturally to be the next new, um, wave. My lame comment on the above post by, I gather, the person who used to edit, run or own the magazine Flexipop was that I'd only want to see Dislocation Dance and the Icicle Works and then I'd be home by late evening (never miss a chance to give a backhander to New Order, etc)* although I would also be interested to see the Stockholm Monsters the next day. But when it comes down to it - my main thought here as always is - this is not about 'things were great then' but 'I was young then'. I see it all the time, people on fb (obviously I choose to be in these groups) lauding music of 30+  years ago when all they're really saying is, 'I was just out of short pants and what a time that is to be alive', whether it's 1210BC or 1983. 

I thought about this because I was playing the Summer Flake album that came out last year and thinking how not one track on it misses the mark. I saw Summer Flake, or at least Stephanie solo, last year and it was amazing. I wouldn't swap that for any of this bullshit. 

Incidentally I'm surprised that the Futurama festival doesn't have a wikipedia entry because it was quite a thing in its day but maybe it's better this way. 

* I have integrity on this, kind of. I saw New Order when they came to Australia for their first tour in 1983 or whenever. When they played G-Mex in 1986 for that 10 years of punk festival I left before they came on. 

I don't know what my problem is with New Order actually and it's petty because they had some pretty great songs, and were really innovative in lots of ways, and I admire many things about them, but I just can't. I guess I feel that deep in my heart they feel the same. It could have been so much better. 

tartu 8 july - 4

  And finally the amazing Tartu station: